UCP Activist: Question on Frauds Made Yarmoshyna Flare up

In Astravets district some people continue asking the head of the Central Electoral Commission inconvenient questions and addressing to other state bodies.

Mikalai Ulasevich, activist of the United Civil Party, writes on the ucpb.org.

"Despite the fact that the EC assumes that preparations and the election itself should be transparent and public, Lidziya Yarmoshyna refused to provide information on each of 33 polling stations. She referred to unfounded and inappropriate assertion that time that the legislation did not provide disclosure of such information.

Ok, we agree. But it is not prohibited. So, a well-known principle of civil law should run. It is allowed! If people ask to announce information specified above, then why is Article 13 EC on transparent and public "election" not implemented, Ms. Yarmoshyna?

Here is another question that is still without answer.

To give transparency to a detailed report on money spent on frauds in Astravets district. But her cessation of correspondence proves that the question has made her burst into anger.

So, dear citizens of Belarus, you may estimate the transparency of the electoral process and its results," the activist says.