It’s Clear Now What Happened In Crocus

Putin suddenly confessed.

A broken clock twice a day shows the correct time. Putin sometimes accidentally does not lie, but blurts out and, contrary to usual, tells the truth. Yesterday, he admitted that "Russia cannot be the target of terrorist attacks by Islamic fundamentalists."

Indeed, the Russian Federation can only carry out terrorist attacks at the hands of Islamic fundamentalists. Hamas will confirm.

It becomes clear what happened in the Crocus Hall.

1. Putin decided to repeat the successful experience of 1999: with the help of a provocative terrorist attack, to rally the relaxed and talking about "normalization" of the population around the throne, to mobilize society for a new escalation of the war.

2. The FSB was entrusted with organizing the terrorist attack. We needed some extremists ready to commit it, whom the Chekist [special agents -Ed.] provocateurs would use in the dark. The most profitable thing was to involve Ukrainians or Russian oppositionists there. However, no such madmen were found among them. They had to use agents among the Islamists. They decided that then they would blame Ukraine anyway.

3. Many cases are well known when the Chekists, in pursuit of new stars, with the help of provocateurs, created ISIS cells from Central Asian migrants, and then they were "valiantly exposed", caught or killed. This was written, for example, by Irina Slavina, who was hunted down by the FSB. In this case, the task was different. It was necessary to catch the Islamists after the attack (and possibly help them in its preparation).

4. The FSB used a group of Islamist migrants under its control. The Chekists allowed the group members to communicate via the Internet with representatives of ISIS Khorosan to motivate future terrorists. They received permission for a terrorist attack. ISIS, of course, did not know that their supporters in faraway Moscow were acting under the control of the Chekist provocateurs.

5. Provocateurs promised terrorists a green corridor to the Belarusian border and the opportunity to escape. Therefore, the attackers did not even try to dissolve into the crowd or change the car. Naturally, they were deceived and detained while they were in relative proximity not only to the Belarusian but also to the Ukrainian border to "confirm the Ukrainian trace."

6. After the terrorist attack, as intended, the Russian authorities began to blame Ukraine for everything and disperse the anti-Ukrainian hysteria. However, they did not take into account that ISIS would be offended. ISIS members were outraged that they wanted to "steal the victory" and began to demonstrate evidence of links with captured terrorists. This greatly spoiled the Kremlin's anti-Ukrainian game in the world. However, in Russia, provocation can work, and the local audience will believe any delusional lies.

Igor Eidman, Telegram