Kremlin Has A Killer Compromising Evidence On Lukashenka Case

Everyone who went to Moscow to bow before the New Year ended badly.

We continue to reflect on Gryzlov's case. As we can see, so far no details or confirmation from the Belarusian side have followed - Lukashenka is hysterically afraid of Gryzlov not for his future activities as an ambassador, but for “the symbolism of the appointment”, writes the CYNIC Telegram channel.

Gryzlov is a man who has been very close to the Russian throne for too long.

The “accountant” in this function failed his mission (through no fault of his own - the conjuncture was different, and, as they later said, he “acted head-on, thereby scaring away all the fish”).

Now the time has come for the “Undertaker” (or “Collector”) - the debt must be paid, otherwise the betrayal must be paid off. Everything, as we love, “according to concepts”.

Since (absolutely not in vain) they recalled the disgraced General Navumau, who was once a member of Lukashenka's “inner circle”, we will have to remind that he fled not to the West, but to Russia. Moreover, he came to Russia under very interesting guarantees. And as a “payment” the Kremlin has killer compromising evidence (with all the evidence, details, and diagrams) on the case of the political assassinations by Aliaksandr Lukashenka.

What does Gryzlov have to do with it? If you remember that time, then you know that it was he who was one of the key figures in the “Navumau deal”.

This material will suit both the Hague and the next “Godfather”.

Gryzlov, in fact, will perform no more than the function of a very vigilant, but still a symbolic observer.

Final result: all previously voiced agreements. There is no All-Belarusian Assembly in the function that pushes Lukashenka through, so they haven’t talked about him lately.

This, in fact, looks like the toughest ultimatum. By the way, Sheiman also has a place in “Navumau's dossier”.

That is, “killing Lukashenka’s rating” and explaining the “coup” in Belarus will not pose any problem for the Russian public.

This is a shah. And the regime has only one option - direct negotiations with the West, which will ensure legitimacy. Therefore, in fact, waves of repression are rolling in gradually - Belarus is trying to “probe” the West for “sore spots” in order to sell prisoners at a higher price. And lifting the sanctions plus a handshake will look like a reconciliation of the parties. When legitimized, Gryzlov will perform the function of imitating an “active dialogue” with zero results, as was the case in his previous position within the framework of the “Ukraine case”. But if Lukashenka does not find an interlocutor from the collective West, then he will have to raise the rate.

Someone really does not want to sign a consent to this ambassador.

In 3 days Lukashenka will cease to be the chairman of the Council of CIS Heads. And a day later - already at a tete-a-tete meeting - he will familiarize himself with the requirements of his master.

Even complete submission does not bode well for Lukashenka - he will then cease to be needed - this is a “mirror projection” of the behavior that the regime itself constantly did with “used cadres”.

In general, “I'm tired. I'm leaving” is better. Everyone who went to Moscow to bow before the New Year ended badly.

P. S. Gryzlov and Navumau, as they say, ate together the other day.