Russian Oligarch Outlines Five Scenarios For Russia's Future
1- 9.07.2026, 15:04
- 1,996
One of them is internal destabilization.
One of Russia’s wealthiest businessmen Andrei Melnichenko, who ranks eighth on the Russian Forbes list, presented five possible scenarios for Russia’s future following a confrontation with the West. According to The Economist, most of these scenarios appear unfavorable for the country: dependence on external power centers, China’s growing influence, an internal crisis, or a transformation into an isolated, militarized state modeled after North Korea.
The first scenario involves Russia’s return to the Western system, albeit in a secondary role. According to Melnichenko, in this case, Moscow would find itself dependent on a new “suzerain.”
The second option is a reorientation toward China. If events unfold this way, Russia will become a raw materials appendage and a buffer zone within Beijing’s sphere of influence. According to the billionaire’s assessment, the difference between the first and second scenarios lies solely in who will be the primary external center of power.
The third scenario involves internal destabilization, accompanied by a struggle among various elite and security factions for resources. Given Russia’s nuclear status, Melnichenko considers this option one of the most dangerous.
The fourth path is the transformation of the country into a closed state modeled after North Korea, characterized by militarization, repression, rationing, and constant external confrontation. According to the businessman, in such a case, confrontation with the outside world would become the main instrument of domestic policy. He also acknowledges the risk of military conflicts spreading to other countries.
Melnichenko considers the only favorable scenario to be Russia as a “sovereign” state, though he ascribes a different meaning to this concept than the Russian leadership does. While for Vladimir Putin, sovereignty is linked to geopolitical confrontation with the West, in the billionaire’s view, it should mean a stable economy, a government focused on the well-being of its citizens, a predictable foreign policy, and the creation of conditions under which people will want to live in and return to the country.
As The Economist notes, Melnichenko is not calling for a direct change in power, but the model he proposes involves moving away from a system of one-man rule. In his view, representatives of the business community, technocratic circles, civil society, and various political forces should be involved in making key decisions.
According to the publication, such statements reflect growing unease among a segment of the Russian elite. Instead of talk of victory, discussions are increasingly focusing on scenarios in which maintaining the current course leads to increased dependence, international isolation, or a deep internal crisis. Following this logic, a positive future for Russia is possible only if the country abandons its current understanding of “sovereignty,” which is based on constant confrontation with the West.